An attempt to rank the international standards can only be effective by an empire of power, the only mandatory rules with power bills cash for each state for security, so it says there is no hierarchy in international law, although no hierarchy in the power of the states. Peremptory norms represent the desire of a community in the frown of a nascent society, international society. The prohibition of aggression and genocide, racial discrimination and slavery, self-determination of peoples and the protection of human rights are some cases of mandatory rules, which have the character of erga omnes, that is customary rules of general international law.
If we analyze the international regulatory system more general adveno force after the Second World War in the hierarchy will note this. In the United Nations Charter, its principles listed in Chapter One states the legal and sovereign equality of states, good faith, are committed to the peaceful settlement of disputes, renunciation of the threat or use of force against territorial and political integrity of states undertake to cooperate and collective security, agree to impose the rules of the Charter despite the lack of consent to this, set a limit on the unrestricted activity of the organization against internal essentially matters states, but this principle yields to the regulations of Chapter Seven, in which establishing a monopoly on the use of international law enforcement forces, the Security Council, held this for a true global oligarchy, consisting of China, United States, France, Britain and Russia, permanent members of the Security Council, a body that is attributed international coercive power, on the grounds of an institution of universal features.
Arguably, the advent of regionalism has seen a boost with the establishment of the United Nations, which strives to resolve international conflicts are always in the context of the will of its stakeholders, in sovereign jurisdiction of their courts, provided they are developed by peaceful means, as a situation which might threaten or undermine peace and security opens the competence of the Security Council to even use regional organizations and resources for their companies for maintenance and restoration peace, for it has national security resources provided by special Conventions, it has the staff, the Governing body, consisting of the highest internal military hierarchy of the permanent members of the Council. Its functions are closely related to the strategic arms race and military.
As for international cooperation in economic and social, formed United Nations Economic and Social Council, under authority of the General Assembly and Security Council's service, were competent to hear the Charter, establish and implement policies aimed at increasing living standards, maintenance of industrial sources, a problem-solving international economic, social, health, educational, cultural and other related matters, based skills with the primary responsibility for achieving maximum cooperation on these issues, in order to protect and enshrine human rights universal without discrimination based on race, sex, language or religion.
specialized agencies are those that exist outside the organization or created subsequent to the creation of this, while their powers are identical or related to those of the Organization, so the states are not legally able to exercise independent policy, away from the purposes and principles of the Organization, then basic domestic institutions such as economics, individual rights, health and cultural institutions, which were typical of sovereign communities, are now reviewed by supranational bodies with the power to implement its policies, but de facto inability to do so. Recall that the General Assembly does not issue binding resolutions per se.
The Economic and Social studies, reports and recommends to the entire international community, submitted to the General Assembly and international conferences, and create agreements and special committees, all in the within their jurisdiction and to the advancement of human rights and their implementation both in legal and in fact within the states.
The trusteeship system was established to enshrine respect for individual rights and collective interests of the peoples under mandates, colonies and non-self governing territories, delivered by the will of the states the Organization or are parts of the defeated state jurisdictions, are all those identified as political peoples under foreign metropolitan powers, as long as they are not committed to the scheme Territories. The Council established a system to inform, monitor and recommend on the territories and the administering authority establishing agreements with this and with the rest of the system of the Organization or its members to implement its policy of emancipation of peoples, which was abolished in 1994 after having met and completed its task, the decolonization of the world not strategic.
The International Court of Justice based in The Hague, the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, of which all its members are ipso facto parties to its Statute, which also can attach non-member states of the Organization, ie not parties to the Charter, which we say, no longer makes sense. Members of the United Nations now number 192, a total of 198 states in the world. After all State Parties to the Statute or only parts of the Charter or both, are all bound by the rulings of the Court in any case of which they are parties, indeed, facing contempt of judgments of this Court by of states will be susceptible measures by the Security Council to compel, and if necessary, by force, to run the Court's decisions, competition and clear decision of the Council, not the Court, as often happens in domestic courts.
The Statute of the Court, as part of the Charter and to have this whole character of peremptory norms of international law, it stating that its supremacy against all treaty and to oblige all member states to meet all these concluding treaties in a particular way and each other and even to lay back in the seat of the organization in New York for each of these treaties to be valid for the Organization as a whole, is also possessed of the necessary legal powers in the territory of each of its member states to implement and put into action its aims and principles. The same Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides that the validity of international law is given by the non-contradiction with the purposes and United Nations principles.
The court rules in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted, so are sources of international conventions wrapper rules expressly accepted by the litigants, custom internationally as evidence of a general practice accepted as law, general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. International jurisprudence and doctrine of the advertised increased competition from other nations will be aids to the determination of rules of law. While the parties dispute could also agree that the Court decides ex aequo et bono. Recall that the judgments of the court are only binding on states parties to the dispute and that she can only go states, is different in its advisory.
The International Criminal Court is a good example of progress in international institutions, has not yet been ratified by a considerable amount of states but their aims are quite ambitious, as in this present not only states, also individuals, on which the court issues binding decisions, so the jurisdiction of the Court appears to be complementary jurisdictions national.
rose an international legal system, which is in constant progress and evolution, the customs code, you agree to conventions, they become permanent and independent institutions and in some cases moving towards degrees political integration, as is the case of European Union countries, leaving behind the old modern paradigm of a community of independent sovereign states.
0 comments:
Post a Comment