The causes fall into Eurocentric imperialism and extra, the same means as international expression, increased interactions between cultures. Commercial imperialism is the result of international competition for markets, the existence of an asymmetry of power, reflected in asymmetric and horizontal exchange in the mixed industrial capacity and dependence. Imperialism is characterized as a vital, economically expressed through a free trade followed by a protectionist or maturation phase. So back to the belle époque, 1880, Germany, United States, France and Russia began to subsidize its industries and transport, with the infant industry argument, especially against the British pre-eminence, were on the search for political settlements ( public) and economic (private), to sell their surplus production and buy raw materials in a "favorable" pity that the world was more or less widespread. Imperialism means higher costs and conflicts, there is no place for that all powers are empires colonies began to be contested free trade among the industrial powers emerging and established, the colonies were usually closed by the metropolis, creating monopolies. Germany, USA, Japan, Italy and Russia were the powers that be wanted industrialising and commercial empires in view of the British Empire had been in economic decline. The imperialism of capital is the next stage of commercial imperialism, is the result of the dispute between the powers for markets, when they close their colonies with protectionist tariff rate, being monopolies, thus decreasing exports but increased FDI and production subsidiaries, banking gained great prominence, becoming owner of much of the capital. The imperialism of the state is seeking greater power and security at the expense of other states, is related to political settlements rather than economic ones and we could say that accompanies the commercial imperialism, is distinguished by its bitter nationalist and a patriot, usually arises as a preventive against competition because triggering a domino effect. There has been talk of imperialism but also mass said that this is the state, ie more policies are born from above rather than from below, is how will we understand the autonomy of these, to the people themselves, if this is sovereign and create policies or otherwise it is a formable mass to the policies of imperialist states, where the monopoly of production is transferred to the press, creating national and cultural imperialism, making public the financial conflicts that were previously developed in the private sphere and justifying ideologies ethnocentric, which in turn are justified by social Darwinism. Imperialism in general is the maturation of capitalism and is used to distinguish an economic era and other post-medieval regime, ie, capitalism and imperialism are part of modernity, but it is also true that the events have gone beyond this. Ancient civilizations were imperialists and capitalists, not from the standpoint of modern industrial, but from the standpoint of technical and cultural, were ethnocentric and competitive.
World War, the war of imperialism, was received with enthusiasm by the masses, was seen as out of the crisis and as a way to increase social benefit a symbol of patriotism and hope for emancipation. There were feuds that seasoned the war, Russia would support Serbia product of Slavic, England against Germany to feel threatened his empire, France against Germany in Alsace-Lorraine. Germany to be late for national integration also was late to the industrialization process unified way out of the deal left colonial view of this Germany is united and industrialized in a fast and efficient, putting at risk the efficiency and English rule. Russia hereditary enemy of Germany and the latter unable to ally with Italy, despite the good relations and possible convenience, because of the deep enmity between Italy and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Germany, due to industrial efficiency and lack of colonial policies, advocating for freedom of the colonies and seemed hungry meet the growing demands of Asia Minor. The war if development from Sarajevo to Versailles and was eagerly awaited by the Socialist International, was believed to be the end of capitalism. England was conciliatory face of aggressive Germany, not raised in a peace that meant the complete defeat of the adversary. United States had a fundamental role because there were no geopolitical presence in the international diplomatic chessboard. England and France there lived a weakness, coming off a defeat Russia and Germany felt that his hour had come. American ideology, characterized by political and economic liberalism, the daughter of the French Revolution, would be contrary to the classic European realpolitik, the balance of power, aristocratic and royalist. Pro In contrast, favors a system of collective security, liberal, based on the principle of nationality, independence, self-determination and democracy, progressive ideology from the point of view and interested people from the economic point of view. For this purpose, was the first general international institution for the maintenance of peace and security by ensuring the peaceful settlement of disputes and punishing their perpetrators. It was certainly a success but lacked practical ideology was an institution that did not conform to reality and did not have the strength to impose its objectives, the agreement lost credibility with the complaint by the United States, marked by the reluctance of Congress U.S. delegation to the sovereign powers, which could limit its imperialist policy based on spheres of influence.
0 comments:
Post a Comment