Day by Abortion Rights of Women in Latin America and Caribbean
Men for Equality expressed its commitment to the legitimate claims to achieve the decriminalization of abortion.
live in a society called "knowledge", in which communication technologies throughout the world not only convey information about what happens and what groups or people calling, but lso t allows us to raise awareness about the need for progress in the achievement of social and political rights.
ago much more than a century that liberal ideology was able to demonstrate to the public on the need for freedom, empowerment of the individual and the attainment of his majority. After the fundamental contributions of feminism made visible the reality of today and yesterday, many still understand that women's rights on his own body, this is to have a right which was conquered by men and ago long.For this reason, Men for Equality adheres to all acts done and the claims for this legitimate right, as men assuming the commitment that we played with our fellow women.
Buenos Aires, September 28, 2009
** SEX EDUCATION, BIRTH CONTROL TO DECIDE NOT TO ABORT-
LEGAL ABORTION, NO INSURANCE AND FREE ** DIE **
LAY BY STATE ** **
A DEAD OR MORE FOR CLANDESTINE ABORTION * * ** WE
PARIMOS, we decided
** ** FOR IMMEDIATE PENALTY BILL PRESENTED NATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR THE RIGHT TO LEGAL ABORTION, safe and free **
17hs We are in Plaza de Mayo marched down Avenida de Mayo to Congress on the street stopping Peru. Concentration 19hs
Congress Plaza - Buenos Aires - Argentina
Attached
open letter to President Vázquez:
Mr President of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay,
Before reading your document because the why's veto of the law regulating the abortion in their country, I can only express my disagreement.
On that there is consensus that abortion is wrong, we agree: it is not a bad practice in itself, but the practice has generated, ie, lack of information, accidents, or many other possibilities. But this evil to avoid what women carry in his gestation for nine months and it is they who are obligated to load in her womb until birth, even against their will. That is power, state power. Max Weber, one of the fathers of modern sociology described the state as one who achieves success achieved with the use of physical violence in a given territory. That power, defined as the ability to make the follow dominated even against their will. That is the law vetoed an instrument of power, an instrument of the state against women and their free right to decide.
The document also adds that in countries where abortion was legalized, the number is multiplied and it has become customary. By contrast, abortion is a common product of social conditions. Abortion kills thousands of women who can not afford good medical practice, simply because poverty does not allow it. Women who have the money to pay, pay an onerous sums black market can only support.
The business of war, drugs, indeed, kill millions of people daily, and none of the opponents of abortion activists raise their voices against these scourges. Of course, drug trafficking and war are also prohibited. But move millions in cash and often escape the responsibility of the international community, countries like ours. But as you said, the degree of civilization is measured by how it treats the most needy. It is highly unlikely that Uruguay can stop hunger in the world, its wars, its drug trafficking and people. But probably, to get women of their country can achieve a better quality of life with access to safe abortion and relevant education to reach that pregnancy interrupted, never happened.
open letter to President Vázquez:
Mr President of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay,
Before reading your document because the why's veto of the law regulating the abortion in their country, I can only express my disagreement.
On that there is consensus that abortion is wrong, we agree: it is not a bad practice in itself, but the practice has generated, ie, lack of information, accidents, or many other possibilities. But this evil to avoid what women carry in his gestation for nine months and it is they who are obligated to load in her womb until birth, even against their will. That is power, state power. Max Weber, one of the fathers of modern sociology described the state as one who achieves success achieved with the use of physical violence in a given territory. That power, defined as the ability to make the follow dominated even against their will. That is the law vetoed an instrument of power, an instrument of the state against women and their free right to decide.
The document also adds that in countries where abortion was legalized, the number is multiplied and it has become customary. By contrast, abortion is a common product of social conditions. Abortion kills thousands of women who can not afford good medical practice, simply because poverty does not allow it. Women who have the money to pay, pay an onerous sums black market can only support.
The business of war, drugs, indeed, kill millions of people daily, and none of the opponents of abortion activists raise their voices against these scourges. Of course, drug trafficking and war are also prohibited. But move millions in cash and often escape the responsibility of the international community, countries like ours. But as you said, the degree of civilization is measured by how it treats the most needy. It is highly unlikely that Uruguay can stop hunger in the world, its wars, its drug trafficking and people. But probably, to get women of their country can achieve a better quality of life with access to safe abortion and relevant education to reach that pregnancy interrupted, never happened.
